Archive for the ‘Current Affairs’ Category

King Buyelekhaya Dalindyebo Annexes South Africa

In the wake of convictions on criminal charges such as murder and assualt, King Buyelekhaya Dalindyebo of the abaThembu has carefully considered his options and, rather creatively, has come up with a brilliant solution to his pending incarceration: annex South Africa! King Buyelekhaya Dalindyebo gave formal notice to the Presidency, parliament and the NPA that following his humiliation at the hands of the High Court of Mthatha and the South African Media, he and his people – loosely estimated at 10 million – will be leaving South Africa, so to speak.

Now lets start with the basics, like who is this entertaining chap? Well he is the Mandela’s tribal chief (ouch) and he was convicted on various serious charges perpetrated against his community like murder, assault and kidnapping. And as to the annexing bit, I must appologise for my sensationalist header; he really is only annexing 60% of South Africa including parts of Gauteng (Johannesburg), KwaZulu Natal (Durban), and parts of the FreeState…and parts of the Eastern Cape – and oh yes, parts of the Western Cape like the beachfront property in Camps Bay.

Notice how he cleverly avoids any area that is economically insignificant like the desert for example although, to best of what I recall from Grade 3 history, he certainly has a better claim to the Karoo than Johannesburg . This is what is so interesting from a legal perspective: clients are always telling you the most amazing tales and fully expect you to put that version to the Judge without any consideration as to actual proof because he is obviously a moron who is going to believe whatever you say…suffice it to say this is not entirely the case. Who really needs proof anyway, right? “Yes your Lordship, Johannesburg could be construed as historically a Bantu area, however prior to the 1300’s…” Let’s stop that right there because this probably won’t reach actual trial stage.

Did I mention that the King also expects R 80 billion in compensation as well as fully expecting the Government to foot the bill for annexing our country. Only in South Africa :-) Well not entirely, remember Tibet? Still, we win for entertainment value and for further entertainment have a look at The Star and The Daily Dispatch

KIng

16 DAYS: Please Help to Break the Chain

Once upon a time when I still had time to watch Oprah, she did a show on child pornography in America: she showed a map with one red dot representing the origin of one pornographic picture of a little girl and within 24 hours the map of America was a vivid red. Most – yes most – of the perpetrators were doing this to their own daughters. Others drugged their daughter’s friends on sleep overs. There are even instruction manuals that catered for all ages starting when they are months old. On these videos you can often hear the girls crying.

This is in America where they are very much aware of what is going on but don’t have the resources to follow all the leads they have, one can only imagine our situation. You know that women get traded like commodities right? I’m blond and thus I would apparently fetch about R 20 000 in Africa, at least I was told that once when I was twenty-one.  The idea is as absurd as it it is real. Women and child abuse in South Africa, if plotted, would paint our map blood red and to me the most frustrating part is the amount of women who either go back or unfailingly choose the same type of boyfriend. So what can you do when someone you know is abused?

Most cities have Domestic Violence Centres which offer a very radical remedy: an all prevailing principle in law is that both sides of a story must heard before a judgment may be taken. At DV, an interdict preventing contact with the victim simultaneously with a interim maintenance order can be made on the victim’s say-so alone by merely filling in a form – the victim never even sees the magistrate who makes the order. A return date is given where the accused may state his case.  Should he contravene the order he may be arrested immediately.

Obviously it’s not this simple: if he knows someone at the local police station, the police may refuse to arrest him, fucked-up but true. My favourite episode at the DV was when a Muslim man stormed in and started yelling at the councillor: how could they tell him not to hit his children when it was his right to discipline them? So he broke the kid’s collarbone – next  time he’ll listen to his father.

The Muslim man broke my stereo-type but many more exit: I live in a well-to-do neighbourhood and the stories that I can tell are just as dark, the shame even thicker. One woman who lived in a white palace with high walls nearby, was kicked down the stairs one too many times so she gassed herself in her car. Abuse is a psychological game that knows no discrimination – it’s everywhere. And that’s why it should be the community who stands up against those who perpetrate these crimes – we should not allow the purposeful isolation that perpetrators contrive to enable then to keep a psychological noose around the victim’s throat.

Please be aware and when you do see something amiss, don’t turn a blind eye – get involved because it is always your place. Another way to help is to support the 16 Days 16 Charities drive: they provide a wide variety of services and are an important stepping stone for those who have nowhere else to go and no-one to ask. Please check it out.

16 Days of activism

Americanisation: A Poke at Homogeneity

Rihana, the American singer, is having a larger impact on SA girls than just getting them to sway their hips; after spotting the third girl in a week sporting her ultimate sign of emancipation – a very short crop, I was wondering exactly how Americanised we are? Heaven forbid, right? The world is an intricate tapestry of different cultures that makes it a vivid place to live in. It also makes it a dangerous place right now. Hindu’s are burning down Christian houses in India, Christians are forbidding Muslim headscarves in schools in France causing riots, ethnic cleansing sees innocents butchered and recent xenophobic attacks in South Africa has made this rainbow nation hang its head in shame. The global village simply doesn’t seem to be naturally inclined to celebrate differences. In view of the reality of a lack of tolerance for differences, it occurred to me that homogenization of the world could be the ultimate answer to world peace.

Multiculturalism in the normative sense is the endorsement of communal diversity. Those in favour cite the right of different communal groups to recognition and respect as well as the alleged benefits to the larger society of moral and cultural diversity. As an Afrikaans person – paradoxically perhaps – I love the colour of my culture and want it to be respected as I respect and welcome other cultures. I could not be a more fervent proponent of this train of thought if I invented it.

Still, let’s be practical – it just doesn’t seem to be working. What is a right unless it can be enforced? If anything has been learnt from our vaunted Constitution, it is that pretty words on paper that are not given force are not only patronizing – the beautiful sentiments expressed therein become virtually irrelevant in the face senseless violent crime. Critics of multiculturalism like Amartya Sen have gone further to say that not only are its sentiments empty words but by emphasizing differences instead of similarities one divides communities further.

The alternative is working towards homogeneity. The idea of a single human race is a bit depressing if you understand what you loose but take that beautiful sentiment and weigh it up against a life, what would you choose? Every day sons are murdered and daughters raped and murdered – what would you sacrifice for a peaceful future? Besides, don’t those guys look cool? (see pic taken at Maponya Mall) So, everyone repeat after me “I am not an individual”…No? Yeah it blows. Think I’ll leave world peace to the UN – they’ve been failing at it for decades, this was just my first try.

Grudging Nod to the Catholics

I’m not a big fan of Christian leaders for too many reasons but in one week I’ve read so many out of – what I deem to be their – character that I feel that I should give them their due when deserved for the sake of fairness.

First, I read about the Pope apologising for sexual offences committed by members of the clergy. Big up dude! I know some might say it’s a bit late or something to that effect but I believe that it’s a step in the right direction. Paedophilia specifically is thought of as an incurable disease and those given to such perversity need a system for life to achieve prevention of these crimes. (I’m not sympathetic – just realistic. Offenders will be released eventually – if convicted – and we don’t want it happening again.)

Then there’s Cardinal Wilfrid Fox Napier who argues that the distribution of condoms show no positive correlation with the prevention of HIV. He uses South Africa as an example and argues not only convincingly but also with some realistic humour at the limits of influence that the Catholic church has on it’s followers. If you feel like a squiz: http://richarddawkins.net/article,2873,n,n

Then last but not least, our dear Bishop Desmond Tutu was even more endearing for his recent apology for the xenophobic violence. You have to give it to the guy – he has never been afraid to grab politicians by the short and curlies and yank them around a bit. His latest display makes you proud to be a fellow South African.

So there it is, a grudging tip of the cap to the Catholics for having a good week.

AIDS Infection a Crime?

There is an opinion held by some in the legal fraternity that sleeping with someone without telling that person that you have the AIDS virus should be a crime. To make this feasible, testing on a regular basis would be statutorily regulated, in other words compulsory for all persons in South Africa.

This is not a new idea – it has been circulating for a few years and I doubt that the State would ever create a crime that is so politically sensitive. I believe there has even been a test case in Durban but it failed on an unrelated technicality. But in a country where a woman is said to be raped every 23 seconds, is this not fair? I know of cases where spouses have cheated on each other and subsequently infected the non-adulterous spouse. The latter is specifically important considering South Africa’s bustling sex-trade industry where a client can buy sex without protection by merely paying a higher premium. Should someone not be held accountable when a person’s life and quality of life is taken away so carelessly? Should a person who willfully sleeps around, knowing that he has the virus not be removed from society? It may also help to lift the stigma around AIDS and encourage dialogue aroundt it – this may be a very positive effect: I know of a case where this stigma prevented a man from accepting anti-retro virals from his employer because accepting them would be admitting that he had AIDS. He died instead. Where his and his wife’s life could have been extended, his baby daughter has been orphaned instead.

Personally, I believe that there is a line between public and private relationships where the government does not belong. I also don’t think making AIDS infection a crime will change anything more than the death penalty could control violent crimes. I do however think that compulsory testing and an action for damages should be available. Requirements, like the fact that a person should go to lengths to enquire about a person’s AIDS status would mean that the responsibility for actions would be shared. But if you did trust someone and that person lied, the least one should be entitled to is damages for medical expenses and a loss of quality of life as is the case when hospitals are negligent or in any accident. This provides the very minimum relief to victims, not accomplices. All of us need to take responsibility for our actions and insisting on a full STD test before sexual intercourse ought to be the rule. But that’s just my opinion – what is yours?

American Doctors and Investment Bankers eat from the trash

No this is not a sensationalist line – it’s people who believe that society throws away too much so they get together at night and dig through trash to find anything they can use and yes – what they can eat. And I kid you not, in status obsessed New York, it is top professionals who take part in this cockroach-like behaviour. Apparently, grocery stores alone throw away $30 million dollars worth of food. And it’s incredible how much of it is truly fine for example roasted coffee in their bags that have past their expiry date but if you think about it… roasted coffee in sealed bags? Expired? Frozen pizzas and canned food follow the same route and in perfection obsessed America, fruit and veggies get chucked when they have so much as a single spot of discolouration. One of the gatherers had a point when she said, “If I told you that that had came from my fridge, would you eat it?” And I have to grudgingly admit that I would have, the food honestly looked fine.

Now I understand that this is not the case in South Africa – or is it? Does anyone know? One major difference is that you would not get the quality of furniture thrown out here that they throw-away there, second hand furniture shops are virtually non-existant. In South Africa we actually recycle so much without even thinking – it makes me proud that those pilchard paper bowls get made here. Still, Im sure grocery stores must throw away stuff – if they give it away and it’s expired, surely they’d open themselves up for law suits? This is definitely the case in America. I know that at the end of the night, certain Doppio Zeros give away packages made up of an assortment of the backed good they did not sell – toasted croissants for breakfast anyone?

Still – I’m fascinated that a place that is so expensive and so status orientated could spawn such a backlash and not too appalled :-)

South Africans in Time Magazines' Most Influential People

This list is incredibly interesting. It reviews such a diverse and interesting group of people with captions written by a wide variety of people. From writers, to politicians, to sportsmen and women, doctors and inventors – it makes you realise exactly what an incredible world we live in when you read about their accomplishments and exploits.

This may say much about how I view South Africa as a participant on the world stage but I was genuinely surprised to find South Africans, who are not Nelson Mandela, in it. I was slightly appalled that one of the two representatives mentioned is Jacob Zuma. The caption names him the president of the ANC but also tells of his rape trial saga and charges of corruption. I guess I was a bit ashamed that as a South African, my future president could be named in the same breath as those associations. Happily he is not our only representative – Oscar Pistorius was there as a triumphant example of the spirit of perseverance that I love my fellow countrymen for. We work hard and we aim to be the best of the best even when the odds we face on a daily basis are not as good as in some more developed ones. I would like to thank Oscar for the gift of being proud as a South African – it’s a morale boost that we sorely need after the last few weeks.

Do yourself a favour, read through these incredible people and I hope that you will be inspired in your life and as a South African.

http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1733748_1733756_1735285,00.html

Show Me the Money Honey

In the interests of promoting individual empowerment I would like to encourage our readers to enter the Sanlam I-Trade competition. Before I go on, let me just say that this is not a promotion for Sanlam, it’s something that I’ve been told about and that I genuinely enjoy. First, about trading online; partly because private investment bankers don’t really treat you as an individual unless you have in excess of half a million to invest and secondly because there is a growing number of individuals who want to invest their own money, the idea of trading as an individual has become popular in recent times. There’s also the private investment clubs going around town where friends band together, like a stok-vel and invest their joint funds. This in particular entails possible dangers but as I’m not here to give legal advice, just be warned to ask questions first.

The sudden interest has spawned courses teaching individuals how stock-market investing works like Share Tracking (not affiliated to any bank or investment company that I know of) and internet trading platforms are being offered by more and more institutions. So how does this work? Well to begin with, the bad news is hat you are obviously all on your own and if you’re interested in this investment form, then I assume you’re quite comfortable calling the shots and taking the risk involved. As far as trading platforms are concerned, I’m going to explain using the Sanlam I-Trade platform because it’s the only one I’m acquainted with. This web-site provides you with every possible form of data you may require regarding specific companies, research and price movements, the latter you can, if you choose, have streamed live as if you were a broker sitting in the JSE. Also included is a learning centre that gives you an idea what to do with all this data, how to conduct technical analysis in other words. For use of the site, one pays a monthly subscription fee of between R15 and R114 rand depending on the package you choose. The only other fee involved is the trading fee which works out to just over 1.1% of your transaction value including tax.

And then ladies and gentlemen, the games begin. Two major bonuses of this site it their Maps application that gives you a visual overview of your portfolio (you have to see it to appreciate it) and the site is incredibly user-friendly – an blind idiot could find his way around (no disrespect meant).

Now back to the competition. Sanlam I-Trade provides you with a virtual portfolio and an account of 1 million rand. You register on-line for free and anyone can enter. Because of the competition, they have an offer on their I-View package of R100 for a subscription for the rest of this year which will allow you access the vast amount of data, charts and of course the learning center. The whistle blows on the 9th of June 2008 and who ever profits most, will win R100 000. You have nothing to loose, much to learn and there’s so much fun to be had.

Trading is of course how the current richest man in the world made his fortune and it’s not rocket science. Even if you play conservatively, in the long-term stocks remain an important part of any balanced investment portfolio and if you do your home work and use common sense, chances are you’ll turn a profit. Shares are also a reasonably conservative investment tool compared to other financial instruments so even though it’s unfamiliar right now, it’s not like you’re jumping into the deep end. Either way – I’ve stated my case and I can assure you I’m definitely entering!

Check out www.sanlamitrade.co.za for more info.

Trends Interrogated.

They may come and go but fundamentally, I suspect trends are here to stay. The world changes as we blink and in those changes we define and are defined. At least that’s what I gather from the experts who eek out a living predicting these mirrors of society. Take Elle Magazine’s own Dion Chang as a case in point. According to him, the current fashion – which most South African women boldly ignore – is volume; enveloping fabric that turns you into a cup cake. This is a reflection of society’s disenchantment with technology and the reflexive need to seek warmth and home-comforts. Naturally interior decorators manifest the same trend in shaggy rugs, warm wood and cork floors and tactile fabrics such as velvet.

My interest lies in how do you predict these fickle seasons that can mean the difference between backing the right commodity and turning a buck or being bankrupt and out of luck? Just two years ago everyone on the stock market was cocky and wearing a set of horns, now the look of the eyes of refugees haunts those weathering the prime-mortgage crisis and it doesn’t take Warren Buffet to tell you things changed very quickly and few expected it.

So far I have no idea how the professionals divine the future but I think I’ve found a trend of my own and it concerns the interesting dynamic of people from different racial and economic classes mimicking each other. I have always found it ridiculous how American white kids dress-up and act like gangsters who in turn aspire to the privileges of the super-rich, mostly white, of the world and their elite club. Before, I thought that somehow the class-system, however determined, will start to fade. I’ve had the privilege to meet people from both extremes of the spectrum and have come to the conclusion that all are fundamentally human. There are very rich people who are incredible human beings and then those that I don’t want to share a meal for what they do to their loved-ones. The same applies to very poor people. But what you cannot get past is the privilege that money buys; the best of everything. The latest privilege that the rich seems to have chosen is the privilege to not to mix with the great unwashed – again. The latest edition of Newsweek is a special edition covering the exploits of the super-rich and I have honestly never been this jealous. According to Newsweek, the elite does not want to shop with us – they arrange private shopping trips after hours, chefs are rented to cook in private dining halls – heaven forbid we step on their Pradas, the profession of the professional butler has experienced an enormous revival and these servants get paid more than a middle manager at a financial company – the list goes on for pages as special editions do.

The question is what is next? Because, at the same time that the rich are closing their circle to mere plebs, for the first time in the history of America, people are starting to question the capitalist ideal of the American Dream. Where once immense wealth was aspired to and admired, many among their populous are starting to resent obscene wealth, especially considering the specialized healthcare that it buys. It seems that Marie-Antoinette has once again ordered the poor to eat cake and they may take her head for it, if they can get past her billion dollar private security force. Yes, Marie-Antoinette is back and in a better position to protect herself and her wealth. Or is she?

My question is why people want access to this club? Surely if no-one wants access there would be no point in being elite? Of course it’s not that simple, wealth perpetuates wealth and yes Marie, we do need to eat in a time when economies are struggling and the individual is not doing well on its own. This is why Schumpeter agreed with Marx that the capitalist system will collapse but for a different reason: capitalism is an economic success but not a social success. In a capitalist world, when things go wrong the poor who is most affected are driven to horrific protests like the French revolution and the recent xenophobic attacks (although there is no justification for the extreme evil committed in the past week). I’m hoping that the real revolution will be found in Thomas Friedman’s new book entitled The World is Flat. It entails the empowerment of the individual through technology so that the playing field between the common individual and the large corporations, owned by the elite, is leveled. That would be the true revolution that will stop the ever repeating circle of the rich versus the poor – or at least temper it with a broadening middle class. May this be the end of a trend that has repeated over eons and the beginning of an entirely new trend in the history of the world.